If the Orphaned Works bill gets passed, the only real change is that people would have to make sure that their ownership of their work could be discovered through a "reasonable search". This simply reinforces a practice which most artists already use.
A little history:When I first started getting into the art scene I saw a lot of people hiding behind aliases. No one wanted to use their real names on the internet in fear that they might, I don't know, get crazy stalkers looking them up in the phone book or something. It was really stupid. This was around the time when I was signing my pieces with some ridiculous looking monogram.
Once people started to take notice of my work I realized that the worst thing I could do for my career was to disconnect myself from my art. I wasn't trying to hide anything, I was trying to get found by people who wanted to pay me money! Constantly shifting aliases and enigmatic signatures were making it harder for people to realize which pieces were mine.
<
END HISTORY LESSON>
When someone sees my work on the net or in person, I want them to have an easy time finding out where it came from. I want them to connect as few dots as possible to my complete portfolio and my contact info. This is the primary reason I started signing all my pieces in block lettering. The other reason, is that my real signature looks like butt.
These days, if someone wants to find me they can google search: any of my aliases, my E-mail, my last name, my full name or the name of most of my pieces. Through any of these searches you can find my name, location, multiple meathods of contact, my portfolio and my resume.
If anyone ever steals some of my art, they can never claim that the piece they took was "Orphaned". Even if they did steal my art, what would that accomplish? Are they really going to make more money off of it than me? The real worth of a working artist is not in a bunch of 'jpg's. It's in their brain.
----
Basics of Painting:[link]Deleting the White: [link] Applying Texture:[link]Painting Demo 1:[link]Painting Demo 2:[link]

Devious Comments
we can do this on our own... no need to fill other's pockets...
--
in shadows i rest my tired soul...
--
~Master War Of The Bloodstained Battlefield~
''- And make it double!!''
--
"Do not ask which creature screams in the night, Do not question who waits for you in the shadow. It is my cry that wakes you in the night, And my body that crouches in the shadow. I am Tzeench and you are the puppet That dances to my tune."
--
"It's Basic Truth of the Human Condition: Everybody Lies" by House
Único Llena Huecos oficial de =noticias
Good points. I particularly dislike it when people plaster the default dA watermark, or some similar atrocity, across the center of their work instead of figuring out how to sign it in some artistic, or at least reasonable, way.
I never fav defaced work, and rarely bother commenting on it.
Steve
--
www.PearwoodDesigns.com
But what about the whole photoshop thing of the A holes who remove signitures and water marks to get money out of your artwork?
Now I know that deviantart is somtimes concidered the myspace of the artworld (wish it wasn't) but it is a easy and cheap way for an online art gallery and ego boost if you are somewhat or are good. However I am also thinking that it is also something that might be held up in court because of the the date of submission of a signed piece that you do, so even if they go and edit out your sig thinking that they can get away with it wouldn't the evidence on DA stand up?
--
Not getting constructive critiques? Want to learn how to give better critiques? Then consider joining The Order of the Artists [link] a critique club focused on art education.
--
Have Art, Will Travel
www.vandalhigh.com
--
Have Art, Will Travel
www.vandalhigh.com
--
---- I'm a trash can for vegetables. ----
How are they making this money with low-res jpg images? How come you aren't?
--
Have Art, Will Travel
www.vandalhigh.com
Previous Page1234Next Page